Originally Posted by Mau_Than_68
Nên hỏi Mau_Than_68 ăn bằng cách nào.
Nên hỏi Mau_Than_68 ăn bằng cách nào.
Th́ ra ông Tr lấy bài này để nhận là ư tưởng mới mẻ của ḿnh. Hay là cũng có thể hai tư tưởng "nhớn" gặp nhau chăng??
Ăn bốc chứ c̣n ǵ nữa, những cái ǵ có thể lót giấy được th́ lót rồi mới cầm . Mấy ông thợ lao động, v́ th́ giờ gấp rút, có thể quên cả rửa tay (chắc quên cả đánh răng ?? điều này ít xảy ra lắm, trừ khi ăn trưa tại "xe lunch"), ăn french-fry th́ nhón mấy ngón tay. Đừng dùng đũa hay fork mà bị coi là dị hợm, coi hông giống ai . Ăn xong đi rồi rửa tay..., cái ǵ chẳng đặng đừng th́ người ta cầm thẳng hoặc nhón ngón tay . Bạn cũng thế bạn có muốn ngón tay dính dầu chiên khoai rồi lại gơ bàn phím không ?
Cách ăn bốc của người Ấn, Miên và Phi (nhà quê) là họ trộn cơm vào đĩa cà ri sền sệt, dùng mấy ngón tay bóp nhẹ rồi chụm lại, nhúm một ít, nén cho chặt, và dùng ngón cái búng ngược lại vào miệng . Họ ăn rất khéo và không rơi văi . Nếu bạn ăn cách này mà gặp đào VN th́ chúc bạn may mắn .
Văn minh Đại Việt đă đi trước châu Âu vào thời chống quân Nguyên . Châu Âu vào thế kỷ 12 vẫn c̣n ch́m đắm trong thời Trung Cổ khi mà vó ngựa của Thành Cát Tư Hăn đă đặt chân lên La Mă, th́ tổ tiên đa đă 3 lần đánh bại đạo quân xâm lược này . Nhưng văn minh Đại Việt dừng lại sau luỹ tre xanh, v́ quá tự hào về chính ḿnh và không nh́n ra những cái tiến bộ của xứ người .
Nếu ta ăn món tây ta dùng dao, nĩa, ăn món ta ta dùng đũa bát, ăn french fry th́ nhón mấy ngón tay , th́ có sao đâu . Có ai dùng đũa mà gắp cái bắp ngô không ? Cái ǵ trông tức cười th́ ḿnh nên bỏ .
Nhưng mà tức cười hay không lại c̣n tuỳ thẩm mỹ chứ ǵ ? vậy có người vừa lái xe vừa ngoáy lỗ mũi coi có được không?. Ah, Nếu ḿnh thấy cái đó hay th́ cứ làm , nhưng coi chừng có đứa lại đưa lên youtube giải trí cho anh em .
Kiểu ngồi nước lụt của mấy chú phỏng dế của mấy mợ giao liên lúc vừa tiếp quản SG, dần dần biến mất . Phải chăng là đă học được cia' thói quen ngồi trên ghế cua/ người thành thi? tuy thế chưa bao giờ các mợ ngồi vắt chân khép áo kiểu mấy cô kư điệu Sài thành, dù các mợ bây giờ làm lớn cả rồi ....v́ sảo v́ thiêu' căn bản từ tấm bé . Nhưng so tài uống rượu và nhậu nhẹt th́ các mợ , các cô hơn nhiều anh "nguỵ" lắm .
:-)
Last edited by Mau_Than_68; 12-01-2012 at 06:28 AM.
chú ư nghe thằng nói câu đầu tiên .
ăn vầy th́ hơi ghê chút nhưng cực ngon ,chiên bột th́ không c̣n ngon nữa , h́nh ảnh cái sự ăn đôi lúc nó ghê thế này , nhưng nếu người khác ác cảm th́ ḿnh nên hạn chế cái h́nh ảnh ăn uống mất thẩm mỹ lại .
tôi không biết uống rựu , bia ,nhưng biết hút thuốc cafe , bạn bè tôi th́ 10 thằng hết 9 thằng là biết uống ,mỗi tháng tiêu vào tiền nhậu đứt nữa tháng lương chứ không phải chơi . Anh em nào ở VN th́ biết cái tệ nạn đi nhậu ngay ,không phải v́ tôi không nhậu mà có quyền phê phán thằng đi nhậu ,tôi nói đây là thằng đi nhậu ghiền ,tối thiểu 1 tuần nhậu trên 3 buổi .
Đồng ư là ra đường đi làm , phải biết nhậu mới được ,cái chuyện tiếp khách khứa kư hợp đồng trên bàn nhậu là đương nhiên ,lên bàn nhậu dễ kư hơn ,nhưng v́ công việc mà buộc phải nhậu th́ ok chánh đáng . (đừng ném đá tôi nha , thông cảm ở VN là vậy không làm khác được )
C̣n cái bọn mà vui cũng nhậu , buồn cũng nhậu , chả vui ,chả buồn cũng nhậu cho qua ngày , kiếm mọi cái cớ để nhậu , giỗ quải , sanh nhật , rửa xe ,rửa bạn gái , trai . Rửa bằng tốt nghiệp , thậm chí rửa hận cũng nhậu
ngày 20 tháng 11 mà cũng có chuyện để nhậu ,thầy cô không nhậu th́ học tṛ nhậu thay để tỏ ḷng biết ơn cô thầy . Nói chung không từ mọi thủ đoạn để nhậu . Không nhậu quán th́ nhậu nhà .
Tính ra tôi không nhậu , chỉ ghiền cafe , thuốc lá cũng hút hạn chế , 1 ngày cũng không tới nữa bao thuốc con mèo , cafe th́ chủ yếu tự pha uống cho hợp khẩu ,cũng ít đi uống quán .tiết kiệm phần tiền nhậu biết bao nhiêu mà nói ,trong khi thằng nhậu cũng cafe thuốc lá luôn .
Bỏ nhậu th́ coi như là phước lớn cho toàn thể dân tộc ta đấy chứ , chưa kể nhậu xong là sanh ra nhiều chuyện nữa , nhậu vào th́ phải đi matxa , không matxa th́ phải kiếm chổ giải quyết cái vụ nóng trong người ,rồi chưa kể chửi nhau ,đánh nhau v́ cái nhậu nhẹt ,về th́ hành vợ ,hành con ....vv
Tốt nhất cấm nhậu luôn .
Tặng 1 cái clip , xem thế hệ trẻ vn nó kiếm ra cái cớ để nhậu rất là phục tụi nó sáng tạo luôn , có đến chục cái lư do để nhậu nhưng lư do cuối là nhậu nhân ngày 11 - 11 - 2011 . hết ư tụi nó luôn , clip có liên quan thịt chuột và nhậu luôn cho hợp không khí ,nhậu chuột .
Thử hỏi 100 người VN: "Có muốn phát triển như Hàn quốc không"?
Chắc chắn, đa số, nếu không là 100%, nói "Có chứ".
Nhưng hăy xem chất CON NGƯỜI.
Hăy nh́n các "thanh niên, rường cột nước nhà", các con chuột đen thui kia.
Có dám mời khách Hàn quốc đến "dự tiệc" chung hay không?
Ai c̣n biết cảm thấy XẤU HỔ?
Hỏi thử 100 người Sài G̣n xem dân Hàn Quốc ăn thịt chó cỡ nào ?
Nó ăn thịt chó thay cơm đây ông Trần.
Nếu ai là người sống tại Sài G̣n như tui có thể kiểm chứng lời của tui.
Đàn ông Hàn Quốc ăn thịt chó c̣n kinh hơn dân VN, ngay cả chó điên nó cũng không chừa nữa đấy, làm thịt chó đăi tiệc nữa, ông hỏi nó thử coi nó có biết xấu hổ không ?
À, tui nghe nói dân Thiên Chúa Giáo ăn thịt chó ghê lắm, ông là người theo đạo Thiên chúa mà nói không ăn thịt chó nghe có vẻ khó tin, hahaha...
Có ngon th́ chửi hết đồng đạo của ông đi nhe.. hahaha ....
Nói rơ là tôi không tán đồng việc ăn thịt chó
Nhưng thấy doc Tran mơ làm người Hàn quốc quá thành ra xem thử người Hàn quốc có chất con người ra sao :
Thử xem chất con người Hàn quốc qua thức ănrất phổ biến của họ :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_meatSouth Korea
A dish made with dog meat in South Korea, Seoul, Korea
Main article: Dog meat consumption in South Korea
In South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea), dog meat is eaten nationwide and all year round, although it is most commonly eaten during summer.[7]
The Korea Food & Drug Administration recognizes any edible product other than drugs as food.[85] In the capital city of Seoul, the sale of dog meat was outlawed by regulation on February 21, 1984 by classifying dog meat as 'repugnant food' (혐오식품), but the regulation was not rigorously enforced except during the 1988 Seoul Olympics. In 2001, the Mayor of Seoul announced there would be no extra enforcement efforts to control the sale of dog meat during the 2002 FIFA World Cup, which was partially hosted in Seoul. In March 2008, the Seoul city government announced its plan to put forward a policy suggestion to the central government to legally classify slaughter dogs as livestock, reigniting debate on the issue.[86][87][88]
South Korean Food Sanitary Law (식품위생법) does not include dog meat as a legal food ingredient. Also, dog meat has been categorized as 'repugnant food' (혐오식품) based on a regulation issued by Seoul Metropolitan Government, of which using as food ingredient is not permitted.[89]
However, the laws are not strictly enforced. The primary dog breed raised for meat, the Nureongi (누렁이), or Hwangu (황구); which is a specific breed, different from the breeds raised for pets in Korea.[90][91]
There is a large and vocal group of Koreans who are against the practice of eating dogs.[92] There is also a large population of people in Korea that do not eat or enjoy the meat, but do feel strongly that it is the right of others to do so.[92] There is a smaller but still vocal group of pro-dog cuisine people in South Korea who want to popularize the consumption of dog in Korea and the rest of the world.[92] A group of pro-dog meat individuals attempted to promote and publicize the consumption of dog meat worldwide during the run-up to the 2002 Fifa World Cup, co-hosted by Japan and South Korea, which prompted retaliation from animal rights campaigners and prominent figures such as Brigette Bardot to denounce the practice.[93] Opponents of dog meat consumption in South Korea are critical of practices that are claimed to improve the flavour of dog meat in Korean tradition, such as beating and hanging.
The restaurants that sell dog meat do so, often exclusively, at the risk losing their restaurant licenses. A case of a dog meat wholesaler brought up on charges of selling dog meat in arose in 1997. However, an appeals court acquitted the dog meat wholesaler, ruling that dogs were socially accepted as food.[94] According to the National Assembly of South Korea, more than 20,000 restaurants, including the 6484 registered restaurants, served soups made from dog meat in Korea in 1998.[95][96][97] In 1999 the BBC reported that eighty-five hundred tons of dog meat were consumed annually, with another 93,600 tons used to produce a medicinal tonic called gaesoju (개소주).[97] As of 2007, the dogs were no longer being beaten to death as they had been in past times.[98]
Dog meat is often consumed during the summer months and is either roasted or prepared in soups or stews. The most popular of these soups is bosintang and gaejang-guk, a spicy stew meant to balance the body's heat during the summer months. This is thought to ensure good health by balancing one's "ki" or vital energy of the body. A 19th century version of gaejang-guk explains the preparation of the dish by boiling dog meat with vegetables such as green onions and chili pepper powder. Variations of the dish contain chicken and bamboo shoots.[99]
Có bác nào tha thiết ước ao làm dân Hàn như doc Tran không ? :D
http://animalrightskorea.org/dog-mea...-industry.htmlCurrent Situation of Korea's Dog Meat Industry PDF Print E-mail
INTRO
Little has changed over the years regarding the dog meat industry in Korea. The selling and processing of dog meat is still technically illegal. The situation could be summed up with this paradox: it is illegal to produce and consume dog meat but it is not against the law.
Debate continues on its legalization but an impasse remains at the moment between the Korean government and animal welfare groups, meaning that everything continues on now as it has done in the past.
THAT MEANS IN PRACTICE:
A Dog's Life: dogs live in tiny cages above the ground all their lives. They are separated from their mothers at an early age and some are slaughtered as pups; they do not feel what walking on the ground is like; they cannot mingle with other dogs other than those in cages beside them; they suffer summer heat and freezing winters outdoors; they are not given water; they have to eat human food waste such as kimchi; they get no exercise; they have been known to have their eardrums burst to prevent them from barking--every natural instinct they have is thwarted by the inhumane and tortuous conditions they must live under.
A Dog's Death: dogs are electrocuted, hanged, beaten or burned to death. There is a perverted belief that the meat tastes better if dogs have high adrenaline levels in their meat before they die. Therefore, some dogs are made to experience extreme fear and suffering in the lead up to their deaths. Some dogs are hanged and then beaten while they are hanging and still alive. Others are hanged and then a blow torch is used on them while they are still alive to remove their hair. Others still are simply beaten and tortured to death. Generally, at the markets, dogs are electrocuted and then their necks are broken.
A Dog's Products: dogs are turned into dog meat, dog meat soup, dog liquor, and dog "health" elixirs. Dubious health claims are made about dog products, included the typical claim that it assists male stamina and sexual prowess. Such pathetic claims are made throughout Asia with regard to all manner of animal products to attract equally pathetic male customers. In Korea, over the hottest days of the year, people follow a custom of eating dog meat because it allegedly increases energy. Exercising for health and energy is apparently too much hard work for dog meat eaters.
Ironically, dog meat has been linked to salmonella and staph infections, and a number of people die every year from eating dog meat. The health problems associated with dog meat have led authorities to try and do something about it, but of course, typically, nothing is done to prevent the deprivation, cruelty and suffering the dogs have to endure.
I. WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN RECENT YEARS
In January 2005, local animal protection groups found out that the OGC (Office for Government Policy Coordination under the Prime Minister) had been studying a new policy on how the government will regulate dog meat. This had been going on for some time behind closed doors.
As soon as the news got out, animal rights groups began a campaign to prevent the government from pursuing this policy. At the end of January, theMinistry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAF) told all groups to stop sending petitions because the OGC was not going to pursue its DOG MEAT SANITATION MANAGEMENT POLICY any further.
March 9, 2005, the Prime Minister announced a new DOG MEAT SANITATION MANAGEMENT POLICY. This was intended to result in the legalization of dog meat in Korea. It is the complete reverse of what KARA and other local animal protection groups were told.
II. LEGAL BACKGROUND AND THE IDIOCY OF DOG MEAT LAWS
1. LEGITIMACY OF DOG MEAT IN KOREA
Dogs are defined as “Livestock” according to the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAF). The purpose of keeping them as livestock--for breeding, killing, or whatever--is irrelevant to the law.
However, dogs are not defined as “Livestock” under the Livestock Processing Law. That is, they are not listed as livestock that can be officially processed as food. Therefore, it can be inferred it is illegal to process dogs for food, but there is no law expressly forbidding it.
It might be argued that since Korean laws are usually strict in listing what is allowed or prohibited, and since dogs are not listed as animals that can be processed as food, then it is illegal to produce dog meat.
The current Animal Protection Law does not ban the slaughter of dogs for meat, nor does it protect dogs on dog farms from abuse. It only applies to dogs kept in a house.
THAT MEANS IN PRACTICE:
It is technically ILLEGAL to process dogs like livestock and use dog meat as any kind of food product.
However, it is NOT ILLEGAL to breed, or raise, or slaughter dogs for dog meat.
(Don't worry if you are confused. So is everyone else, and the government conveniently keeps it that way.)
2. SANITATION LAW ADDS TO CONFUSION
The Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) proposed that animals not listed as livestock under the Processing Law come under a Sanitation Law. So the people keeping dogs as livestock must comply with sanitation requirements under the Sanitation Law.
Dogs are not defined as “livestock” in the Sewage Disposal & Live Stock Waste Water Treatment Law under MOE (Ministry of Environment).
Food is defined as “anything edible, except medicine” under the Sanitation Law, but the KFDA did not interpret dog meat as “food” under the Sanitation Law.
In 1984, the City of Seoul adopted a city code banning dog meat as “Disgusting Food" in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, but this seems to have been announced more than entered into law because it is not enforced. Nonetheless, using dog meat as a food ingredient is technically illegal.
(This provision was possibly dropped during a 1987 policy revision.)
THAT MEANS IN PRACTICE:
Dog meat restaurants were not fined or forced to close their businesses for violating Seoul City Codes, or for violating the Food Sanitation Law.
Because the KFDA does not interpret dog meat as food, it allows dog meat restaurants to operate without complying with the Food Sanitation Law.
Virtually all dog farms and dog slaughterhouses do not have proper sewage disposal systems and pollute the soil and water, but they cannot be prosecuted because dogs are not defined as “livestock” under the Sewage Disposal & Live Stock Water Treatment Law.
3. THE ANIMAL PROTECTION LAW REVISION, 2004.
This was the first time the Korean Government actually made substantive revisions to the contents of the Animal Protection Law since it was legislated in 1991.
There have been 4 revisions in the past, but they were all concerning new names or titles of government organizations or related laws.And the government’s attempt to revise the law in 2002 was put on hold because the government and local animal protection groups could not reach any agreement.
Over the years, the Korean government has kept changing what agency is in charge of the Animal Protection Law revision. At this time, the Domestic Animal Sanitation Department under Live Stock Bureau of the MAF (Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry) is in charge of the Animal Protection Law revision.
The Korean government claimed that they were revising the Animal Protection Law to improve animal welfare so that Korea will conform to international standards of animal welfare. However, the MAF refused to even discuss the banning of dog meat.
Part of the reason for revising the Animal Protection Law was the rapid increase in pet ownership in Korea, which raised the need to develop some sort of solution to manage pet related problems. Especially, it is sad to say, the control and the management of stray and abandoned dogs.
III. THE KOREAN GOVERNMENT’S POSITION
The Koren government says it is not legalizing dog meat because dogs are not being classified as “Live Stock” according to the Live Stock Processing Law.
It says it is enhancing the standard of animal welfare by increasing the penalties for animal cruelty.
It says it is revising the Animal Protection Law to punish cruelties and the slaughter of dogs in public places, such as streets and open markets.
It says it is regulating the dog meat trade and related businesses for public health and safety and environment reasons.
It says this is what the majority of Koreans want.
HOWEVER, THE GOVERNMENT'S STATEMENTS ARE NOT TRUE:
The government has in the past tried to get around the live stock classification barrier by regulating dog meat as “Food” under the current Food Sanitation Law. That way it will not matter whether dogs are defined as “Live Stock” or not in the Live Stock Processing Law. It will invariably try again.
A provision that punishes the cruel slaughter of dogs in public spaces CANNOT prohibit the same cruel acts happening in private establishments such as dog meat restaurants.
If the Korean government is truly concerned about public health, it should ban dog meat without any further delay. That will solve the problem of food poisoning from dog meat and the waste and sewage problems caused by dog farms and dog slaughterhouses.
The government tries to keep the public uninformed and ignorant as to what is going on. Its study for a DOG MEAT SANITATION MANAGEMENT POLICY was conducted but kept from the general public. The OGC (Office for Government Policy Coordination under the Prime Minister) refused to release it.
The general public is often deceived and misled by the Korean Government and certain sections of the Korean News Media.
IV. KOREAN MEDIA COVERAGE
The Korean news media does an amazing job of white-washing the realities of the dog meat industry. It tends to praise efforts by the government to legalize dog meat. Deep issues are not explored and everything is reported on a superficial level, as if to mollify the public and deflect attention. Typical statements take the following form:
Legalization is better because dogs will be killed with less pain
Legalization is better so that your pet dogs can be protected.
Legalization is better so that dog meat will be safe to eat.
HOWEVER, THE MEDIA LEAVES OUT THESE REALITIES:
Punishment for the cruel slaughter of dogs in public does not stop cruel acts happening behind closed doors.
It is unethical and wrong to separate dogs for meat and dogs for pets in the first place. To say there is a dog especially bred for eating, does not mean that it is different from other dogs in nature. It has the same intelligence and feelings and it will suffer as much as any other dog. The dog-for-meat notion is a smoke screen to keep people ignorant. It gives people an excuse not to think about the real issues.
It is practically impossible to enforce a law ensures everyone adheres to the dogs for meat and dogs for pets division. Any pet can end up as dog meat and many do. Pet dogs are being bought or abducted and slaughtered for dog meat and dog liquor all the time.
V. IN CONCLUSION
For various reasons the Korea government, past and present, has never tried to clarify the legitimacy of dog meat or prevent illegalities.
Unfortunately, the Korean government has a tendency to pursue policies aimed at legalizing dog meat rather than fixing all the problems associated with it.
Banning dog meat is the best way to protect people from food poisoning and other diseases that people get from eating dog meat. It is also the only way to protect people’s pet dogs from ending up as dog meat.
Finally, banning dog meat is the best way to stop the terrible cruelties perpetrated against dogs and the horrendous suffering they must endure from birth to death.
Short of banning dog meat, the only way to shut down the industry is for everyone to stop buying dog industry products.
Hàn quốc có cả kỹ nghệ thịt chó đấy Thảo nào có kẻ thèm thuồng làm dân hàn quốc :D
Animal abuse in South Korea : Dog eating and beatiing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BVkP...eature=related
Its a fact!! Koreans eat dogs and cats
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmzvW...eature=related
South Korea Dog Meat Festival Cancelled After Animal Rights Protests
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_886427.htmlDog may be a staple ingredient in various Asian cuisines, but that wasn't enough to silence South Korean animal rights activists, whose repeated protests lead to the cancellation of a Seongnam festival focused on promoting canine meat's consumption.
As the AFP is reporting, the festival -- planned to “showcase canine food products, including barbecued dog, sausages and steamed paws” and to be held in a traditional open-air market -- quickly stirred fury from South Korean animal advocates and many Internet users, who conducted several online campaigns to force the event's cancellation. "This is making our country an international laughing stock, and making the whole world mistakenly believe that all South Koreans eat dogs," Park So-Youn, head of Coexistence of Animal Rights on Earth, is quoted as saying.
The continued protests eventually led to a lack of appropriate space for the event. "We couldn't possibly go on with the plan due to endless phone calls of complaint...now there are few willing to rent us a place for the event," Ann Yong-Geun, an adviser to Korea Dog Farmers' Association and a professor of nutrition at Chung Cheong University, told AFP.
Though the event has already garnered international headlines, just how popular dog meat truly is throughout South Korea remains a matter of debate. As the Wall Street Journal notes, dog meat soup, for example, "is not as popular as most news stories make it seem. A minority of people eat it regularly. It’s consumed most frequently in summer but is available year-round. And it’s more popular with men than women and is said to possess qualities that “help stamina.”
Of course, for those who do enjoy their dog meat, the South Korean event's cancellation seems unlikely to have lasting implications. As the Daily Mail reports, a similar, week-long festival kicked off without a hitch in China. "It is just like other meat," one local explained. "Smaller animals tend to be more delicate and sweeter while very big dogs have a strong, muscular taste."
Có cả thịt chó đóng hộp nữa đấy . "Văn minh " quá .
Last edited by Phạm Thái; 12-01-2012 at 10:34 AM.
Đọc bài này của 1 trí thức Hàn quốc yêu tổ quốc , yêu đồng bào
Koreans and Dog Meat
By Professor Yong-Geun Ann, Ph.D.
Chungcheong College
Hyo-Il Publishing Company
http://wolf.ok.ac.kr/~annyg/b3.htm
Trí thức PHD thiệt (giáo sư thiệt luôn ) khác hẳn với "trí thức" ảo . Người ta trân trọng cội rễ của ḿnh chứ đâu coi thường nhục mạ .I wrote this book for two reasons. One is to make known worldwide the history and tradition in which Koreans have eaten dog meat, the various recipes and the traditional concept of dogs and the other is to eliminate the controversy surrounding the edibility of dog meat.
All humans try to improve the environment in which they are placed and enhance the quality of their living, which is the essence of culture. A group or society forms a relatively unique culture thereby outlining its distinctness. But western culture has a strong tendency to dislike the foods of other cultures. It is this prejudice which puts the 'foreign' culture's food in the wrong.
Eating dog meat is Korea's own inherent food culture, which has a long history. Nevertheless, some extremist animal protection groups chastise consumers, threatening them with a campaign to boycott Korean products, even promoting the nonparticipation in the 2002 World Cup. Pros or cons arguments over the edibility of dog meat are rising again since some Koreans who do not like dog meat are voicing their opinions.
The debate over the edibility of dog meat is not worthy of a second thought. The history that Koreans used dog meat as food was originated from such a long time ago long that it cannot be dated back. Koreans have eaten dog meat more than any other. As certain dogs in Korea are raised for domestic consumption, Koreans should not be ashamed due to the misguided views of others.
Giving in to pressure from mostly foreign dissenters, Korea has banned the use of dog meat. In doing so, this has reduced the sovereignty of Korea and what it stands for. That is the revelation of submissive idea under the influence of foreign country to lower ourselves down, having a negative view on dog meat.
The resumption of the controversy over the edibility of dog meat is due to the federal government's tepid attitude. The federal government should allow nationals to slaughter dog and eat it by law, regulating the whole process ranging from breeding to slaughtering, processing, and distribution, and let Koreans eat dog meat without trepidation. Regrettably, the federal government hasn't made any decision on it up to now. It is due to the fact that the government is being pulled in opposing directions with the animal rights activists on one side and the dog meat consumers on the other.
Another important reason is from the fact that country that exports beef to Korea is eager to block the legality of dog meat according to the newly-revised international trade order following the Uruguay Round. The reason is by banning the consumption of dog meat, Korea's importation of foreign beef with increase by the same amount
Basic problem over the edibility issue is left up to Koreans alone. Though government authorities drive dog meat restaurants into the 'underground', many Koreans still enjoy dog meat. Will it be possible for Koreans not to eat dog meat, and will the criticism and attacks cease if government should take measures to ban dog meat? The attitude of feeling shame by eating dog meat, of humbly lowering ourselves, shifts the cause of the problem and only hinders the solution, spoiling our pride.
The only way of solving the problem is to recognize dog meat as a traditional food and develop it further. In many ways, Korea is historically and culturally among the top in the world, but it lacks not only in a firm pride and belief in a traditional culture, but also in a strong will to make it known worldwide. Now, people around the world show a great enthusiasm to the export of their culture. We should be proud and have a belief of what we have. It is required to make various food using dog meat and gourmets should come to Korea to enjoy dog meat. For this, Korea needs to set up a research institute, invest in research, and also breeders of dogs and dog meat restaurant owners should form an association, insisting on their own claims, with the expansion of their interests. By doing so, we should make known worldwide our unique culinary culture of dog meat.
Thằng đeo kiếng mập mập nh́n trắng đấy chứ bác. C̣n con ghệ ngồi bên tay phải của nó cách một người cũng đâu có đen bao nhiêu.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks