(continued)
[url]http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-01-22/news/ct-met-trice-welfare-20120122_1_food-stamp-welfare-issue-cash-assistance[/url]
[B][COLOR="#FF0000"][SIZE=6]Welfare issue makes political comeback
Newt Gingrich calls Obama 'the most successful food stamp president in American history'[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
January 22, 2012|By Dawn Turner Trice, Chicago Tribune reporter
Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich recently offered to attend an NAACP convention to explain why African-Americans "should demand paychecks instead of food stamps." And he has described President Barack Obama as "the most successful food stamp president in American history."
While the Republican presidential race has brought the welfare issue to the forefront, critics say it has also resurrected stereotypical images of the black "welfare mother" having out-of-wedlock babies so she can stay home and live large off the taxpayers.
When it comes to welfare, perceptions have often trumped reality. Among the facts:
•Though blacks are disproportionately represented among food stamp recipients, far more whites receive such assistance. When recipients identified themselves by race in 2010, 34 percent were white, 22 percent were black and 16 were percent Hispanic, the Agriculture Department said.
•Food-stamp spending has indeed increased under Obama, but its steady climb began under President George W. Bush.
•Blacks form a slight plurality in Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF, a system that offers cash assistance and is much smaller than the food stamp program. Of families receiving TANF help in 2009, 33 percent were African-American, 31 percent were white and 29 percent were Hispanic.
•Since passage of the 1996 Welfare Reform Act, those seeking cash assistance have faced strict work requirements and a five-year lifetime limit.
•In some welfare categories, rolls have dramatically declined. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which runs the TANF cash assistance program, about 1.9 million families received TANF funds last year, down from a record 5 million families in 1994.
So why has welfare emerged as an issue this election year? Discussions about anti-poverty programs certainly have a place in national campaigns, particularly during tough economic times. But University of Chicago political scientist Michael Dawson says Gingrich was using welfare as a wedge issue.
"It was a blatant attempt to resort to a 40-year-old tactic to prop up one's campaign by evoking the black-person-on-welfare trope," said Dawson, the director of the university's Center for the Study of Race, Politics and Culture. "It's a tired tactic but one that's sometimes effective in [COLOR="#FF0000"]mobilizing white [B]racial resentment[/B][/COLOR]."
He recalled that [COLOR="#FF0000"]in 1976, when Reagan lost the Iowa caucuses, he began talking about a "welfare queen" from Chicago's South Side.[/COLOR] Gingrich's "paychecks instead of food stamps" comment came after he finished fourth in Iowa. He won Saturday's South Carolina primary.
Celeste Watkins-Hayes, author of "The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class and Policy Reform" said American policy on poverty has long been shaped by the tension between the ideals of rugged individualism and society's role in providing safety nets.
"But the system has changed so much that it's difficult to stay on the rolls," said Watkins-Hayes, an associate professor at Northwestern University.
[COLOR="#FF0000"]"Politicians rely on the fact most people don't know the facts and their beliefs are so entrenched that they don't question the validity of a statement like: 'The majority of people on welfare are black and not working.' Or that people can stay on for generation after generation. The facts or the realities don't matter."[/COLOR]
Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, has a different objection to Gingrich's comments. According to Rector, the candidate shouldn't just be focusing on food stamps, but on all of the expensive means-tested government programs.
"I think the government needs to play a role in providing a safety net, but it needs to be more like a safety trampoline than a safety bog," said Rector.
"Yes, cash assistance was greatly overhauled, but other programs went virtually untouched and they continue to grow. I think it would be more accurate to call Obama 'the Welfare President.'"
[COLOR="#0000FF"]The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonpartisan think tank, said anti-poverty programs make up about 20 percent of the federal budget, and that's been true over the last three decades when both Republicans and Democrats have been in power.[/COLOR]
[COLOR="#0000FF"]Among the big social safety net expenditures in 2011 are [COLOR="#FF0000"]Medicaid ($274 billion) and refundable tax credits, including the earned income tax credit ($102 billion). Food stamps ($71.8 billion) and cash assistance ($6.9 billion) [B][SIZE=7]constitute just 2.2 percent of the federal budget[/SIZE][/B], [/COLOR]but they pack a bigger wallop when it comes to public perceptions.[/COLOR]
Tom Smith, a researcher with NORC, a social science research center at the U. of C., said that when the center conducts its survey asking Americans what the country's spending priorities should be, "welfare" often lands near the bottom of the list while "helping the poor" ranks much higher.
( to be continued )