Hiện nay thấp nghiệp xuống c̣n 4.7%. Muốn xuống bao nhiêu nữa?
[Img]http://cdn.tradingeconomics.com/charts/united-states-unemployment-rate.png?s=usurtot&v=201703161722t[/Img]
[Img]http://cdn.tradingeconomics.com/charts/united-states-unemployment-rate.png?s=usurtot&v=201703161722t&d1=20070101&d2=20171231[/Img]
Nếu Trump muốn giảm thất nghiệp th́ nên tập trung vào những công nhân mà trong tương lai sẽ bị các công ty thay thế bẳng robots. Ước lượng cho tới năm 2020 sẽ có khoảng 5 triệu người Mỹ bị robots giựt mất việc làm.
[B]Robots expected to replace some five million jobs by 2020[/B] [url]http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/robots-replace-5-million-jobs-2020/#ixzz4ckdc7e2o[/url]
[I]And while previous industrial revolutions have catapulted the human workforce forward, this one may set us back — at least in the short term. According to the researchers at the WEF, “current trends could lead to a net employment impact of more than 5.1 million jobs lost to disruptive labor market changes over the period 2015–2020.” The Forum estimates that a grand total of 7.1 million jobs will be lost as a direct result of many of our proudest innovations, and that two-thirds of these jobs will be “concentrated in the Office and Administrative job family.” Concurrently, two million jobs will be gained in what the WEF calls “several smaller job families.” Still, it’s a net loss for human beings, at the expense of machines we’ve ourselves created.
The jobs most at risk of being replaced by machines are those in “administrative and routine white-collar office functions.” Furthermore, some industries where machines already play a large part, like manufacturing and production, will see further robot substitution, but the Forum notes that humans “retain relatively good potential for upskilling, redeployment, and productivity enhancement through technology rather than pure substitution.”[/I]
Dân biểu Eric Swalwell: Người vô tội không xin được miễn nhiễm h́nh sự khi đối chất
Dân biểu Swalwell, một thành viên của Ủy ban T́nh báo Hạ viện, đă đả kích lời đề nghị miễn nhiễm h́nh sự của Michael Flynn, người đầu tiên được Trump chọn làm cố vấn an ninh quốc gia nhưng buộc phải từ chức v́ có quan hệ với t́nh báo Nga trong giai đoạn trước khi Trump đắc cử tổng thống.
Swalwell nói với Don Lemon trên CNN Tonight: "Nói chung, những người vô tội không t́m kiếm sự miễn nhiễm h́nh sự". "Tôi không muốn nghe lời đối chất từ ông ta trong một hoàn cảnh có điều kiện."
Nghị sĩ California phản ứng trước nguồn tin phấn khởi rằng Flynn sẵn sàng ra làm chứng trước các điều tra viên liên bang và quốc hội trong cuộc điều tra liên tục của họ về việc Nga can thiệp vào cuộc bầu cử ở Mỹ, nhưng chỉ khi ông được miễn nhiễm h́nh sự, luật sư của ông tuyên bố hôm thứ Năm.
[B]Rep. Eric Swalwell slams Flynn's proposed immunity deal: Innocent people don't seek immunity[/B] [url]http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/31/politics/eric-swalwell-michael-flynn-immunity-testimony-don-lemon-cnntv/index.html[/url]
[I]Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, blasted former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn's proposed immunity deal.
"Generally, innocent people don't seek immunity," Swalwell told CNN's Don Lemon on "CNN Tonight." "I don't want to hear from him in a setting where there are conditions."
The California congressman was responding to the revelation that Flynn is willing to testify before federal and congressional investigators in their ongoing probe into Russian meddling in the US elections, but only if he is granted immunity, his lawyer said Thursday.
"Gen. Flynn certainly has a story to tell, and he very much wants to tell it, should the circumstances permit. ... No reasonable person, who has the benefit of advice from counsel, would submit to questioning in such a highly politicized, witch-hunt environment without assurances against unfair prosecution," Robert Kelner, Flynn's lawyer, said in a statement late Thursday.
"I think we should hear from him in the public and that we should get to the bottom of just exactly why was he working with Russia," Kelner said. "As a former Defense intelligence agency director, he of all people knows that agency is connected to Russia's intelligence services and so to take money from them and to work with Russian ambassador after sanctions were put on Russia and to lie to the vice president. that's powerful evidence that he knew what was going on and this was converging at the time of Russia's interference campaign."[/I]